December 4, 2010U.S. report: Strategic Framework Convention on the correct basis for relations between Baghdad and Washington
BAGHDAD - morning
A report issued by the Brookings Institution that the U.S. strategic framework agreement signed between Iraq and the United States must be the correct basis for the relationship between the two countries.
Iraq : U.S. report: Strategic Framework Convention on the correct basis for relations between Baghdad and Washington
The report, issued yesterday: "the interest of Washington to regain the political leadership of Iraq's ability to steer the country towards greater stability and inclusive and effective governance."
"The priority for the U.S. interests in Iraq is not to allow Banhaddarh into the abyss of violence or civil war," noting that "the outbreak of civil war in Iraq would be disastrous for the interests of the U.S. Supreme vital because of Iraq's resources and proximity to the vital Gulf region economically sensitive and geographically and strategically ".
And issued a report titled "U.S. Strategy in Iraq and the unfinished business," a group of five members, headed by Kenneth Pollack of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution.
"The second priority is recommended that it is imperative not to build Iraq as a hostile state, but not so strong, cohesive due to the recession and internal conflict does not threaten its neighbors."
The third priority focused on "Building Iraq to be perfect, strong and prosperous, and an ally of the United States," noting that "very difficult to ensure that Iraq's return to civil war, but we must not seem a new bogeyman in the Gulf region."
The report demanded that the "Washington to show Iraqis that they are benefiting from the continued U.S. intervention, but in the form of aid and investment and technical assistance, and Washington should help Iraq to regain its full international by solving diplomatic issues the main left behind by the Saddam regime."
He also said that "security in Iraq would collapse if it broke down the political process and cause the collapse of the country's economy too," pointing out that "the main priority higher for the United States withdraw its military forces over the next few years and build the internal political process and work out correctly."
It concluded that the United States to maintain in its agreements with the new Iraq to be U.S. forces as peacekeepers.
http://translate.google.com/translate?you go stevehl=en&sl=ar&u=http://www.alsabaah.com/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dwww.alsabaah.com%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dmozilla%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
A report issued by the Brookings Institution that the U.S. strategic framework agreement signed between Iraq and the United States must be the correct basis for the relationship between the two countries.
Iraq : U.S. report: Strategic Framework Convention on the correct basis for relations between Baghdad and Washington
The report, issued yesterday: "the interest of Washington to regain the political leadership of Iraq's ability to steer the country towards greater stability and inclusive and effective governance."
"The priority for the U.S. interests in Iraq is not to allow Banhaddarh into the abyss of violence or civil war," noting that "the outbreak of civil war in Iraq would be disastrous for the interests of the U.S. Supreme vital because of Iraq's resources and proximity to the vital Gulf region economically sensitive and geographically and strategically ".
And issued a report titled "U.S. Strategy in Iraq and the unfinished business," a group of five members, headed by Kenneth Pollack of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy at the Brookings Institution.
"The second priority is recommended that it is imperative not to build Iraq as a hostile state, but not so strong, cohesive due to the recession and internal conflict does not threaten its neighbors."
The third priority focused on "Building Iraq to be perfect, strong and prosperous, and an ally of the United States," noting that "very difficult to ensure that Iraq's return to civil war, but we must not seem a new bogeyman in the Gulf region."
The report demanded that the "Washington to show Iraqis that they are benefiting from the continued U.S. intervention, but in the form of aid and investment and technical assistance, and Washington should help Iraq to regain its full international by solving diplomatic issues the main left behind by the Saddam regime."
He also said that "security in Iraq would collapse if it broke down the political process and cause the collapse of the country's economy too," pointing out that "the main priority higher for the United States withdraw its military forces over the next few years and build the internal political process and work out correctly."
It concluded that the United States to maintain in its agreements with the new Iraq to be U.S. forces as peacekeepers.
http://translate.google.com/translate?you go stevehl=en&sl=ar&u=http://www.alsabaah.com/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dwww.alsabaah.com%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dmozilla%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:unofficial
