Friday, August 20, 2010

New scenarios to form a government after Ramadan ...

August 21, 2010

Disclosure of new scenarios to form a government after Ramadan, Saudi Arabia, confirm that the desire to take over al-Maliki to form a government, otherwise there is no diplomatic relations between the two sides...

The Iraqi sources in Damascus, the follow-up the process of forming the Iraqi government's intriguing to reach an agreement visitation second flavor Syria, similar to the Taif Agreement which ended the civil war in Lebanon, through the expanded meeting was held in Damascus to the forces of Iraq winning the election in order to ease the crisis form a government.

It said Iraqi sources familiar with the idea of meeting in Damascus was the initiative of Turkey and the blessing of an Arab, especially Saudi Arabia, which is always meddling in Iraq do not want to take over Maliki's second term, saying that if Maliki took power, the ministry there is no relationship between the two sides, after the insistence of several Iraqi parties to demand the intervention of Arab to end the crisis and the Iraqi government to reach a compromise to stop the projects carried by U.S. visitors to Baghdad, U.S. officials, in order to reach a solution, away from the influence of Iran and the U.S..

The sources to be expanded meeting of the end of Ramadan, either before the holiday or later ruled out the presence of Maliki's meeting because he was out of the game to form a government after the cessation of the National Coalition and the Iraqi List Hawwarathma with him because of his insistence to be the next prime minister pointed out that there are four scenarios on the table to form a government of ethnic They are:

First: to form a government independently of al-Maliki made up of Kurds (58 seats) - Allawi (91 seats) - Hakim (71 seats), more than half + one.

Second: the formation of a transitional government of a political nature under the chairmanship of the Iraqi List headed by Allawi, with the condition that the participation of the election winners.

Third: The government of national salvation of a military character under the chairmanship of the bloc winner.

Fourth: The United Nations intervention in the formation of the Iraqi government and force all blocks to accept the terms of the United States and the United Nations.

The sources pointed out that the scenarios last three are not new and date back to 2005 during the government of Ibrahim al-Jaafari, when I got the standoff certain I've put Lakhdar Brahimi, the representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations in Iraq, the three projects referred to end sectarian strife and to satisfy the Arab and regional levels, at the University of Arab States in Cairo in the presence of Iraqi politicians and their opponents Islamists and secularists of various shades, Tehran has strongly opposed such projects and held a secret deal with Washington, it approved the recent suspension of these projects to the need to serve their own interests, even re-launched it again now.

According to Iraqi sources informed that there the idea evolved to the Iraqi politicians that their government is expected not only constituted the intervention of Arab exchange and coordination with Turkey, to halt the projects the U.S. is viewed as sources of these projects are that they lead to suspending the Constitution and the elections democratic Iraqi list the winner.

The sources accused the U.S. of projects seeking to renew the mandate of the al-Maliki on the pretext of preventing a constitutional vacuum and impede the political process of U.S. withdrawal from Iraq.

Received sources the causes of efforts by Washington to his al-Maliki to Washington too much concession and free at the expense of Iraq, including an agreement signed by al-Maliki in 2008 without being submitted to the referendum and expire in 2011, with the withdrawal of the last U.S. troops from Iraq as sources considered that the agreement confiscated Iraqi sovereignty as a whole.