Abdul Khaliq Hussein
Needless to say, the political situation in Iraq is very complex, with mixed the cards for many reasons, including the legacy of the past, and the nature of Iraqi society and privacy, and conflicts raging between the forces of political power, and the multiplicity of political entities and the components of national, religious and sectarian, and interference by neighboring countries along with their media biased to one party or another, all these factors operate on mixing-piggledy, and the disruption of vision and mislead public opinion in Iraq.
The problem faced by the intellectual that he sometimes finds himself in a position to be attacking him to power, incredible and confirms all the rumors about and attitudes found, even if not absurd, but refused to cope with such situation, accusation of "intellectual power" ready right.
Below are some examples of the charges against al-Maliki difficult ratification, the folly it is the abuse of the mind, but Kzbnaha we are exposed to the charge of bias for a man, and God forbid!!!
It should be noted that some of the major political entities have external support from neighboring countries, Vaketlp "Iraqi" led by Dr. Iyad Allawi, backed by Syria, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries.
And "Iraqi National Coalition," led by Mr. Hakim, which includes the Supreme Islamic Council, the Sadrists and others, backed by Iran.
The coalition of the "state of law" led by Mr. Nouri al-Maliki, as I seem, without external support, not from Iran or others, as is well known and explicit hostility to Syria and Saudi Arabia who al-Maliki.
Also know that the Dawa Party, which belongs to Mr. Maliki, has cut off ties with Iran when he left in the eighties of the last century, and resorted to lead him to London and Damascus to get rid of the Iranian influence.
This is why we know that Maliki is not a follower of Iran, as some claim.
In the midst of this chaotic situation and Almillb, newspaper (Middle East) Saudi Arabia, renowned for their support of Dr. Allawi, reported the statement attributed to the source of the coalition of the wise, as saying that: "Iran is determined to keep al-Maliki despite the objections of everyone." (Middle East, 22/07/2010).
The purpose here is to discredit the Maliki and not love him and show it like a man Iran favorite!!.
**The usual in such cases, claimed the newspaper's correspondent that the source is "unnamed" This claim became cheap and easy way Itekz a book to pass the reports as they like.
Therefore, in this case, the reader uses that word to the wise Nebahth and its ability to analysis to distinguish the wheat from the chaff.
The true this statement as a source in the coalition of the wise, this is the door (the charge works and that was false) or, as our brothers the Egyptians: (hit me and cried, before me and complained about), since as explained above, the purpose of the broadcast so rumors is to keep the idea of bias Iran to block al-Hakim and discrediting al-Maliki. This, if anything, it indicates that the supporters of al-Hakim.
Began to realize that Iran's reputation in Iraq has fallen to the bottom because of the brutal interference in Iraqi affairs, and not the latest occupation of the oil wells Fakkah border.
If Iran is really biased towards Maliki's why it took this terrible act of aggression against Iraq, which was the primary purpose is to embarrass the Maliki and is shown to be weak against its rivals.
In fact, the purpose of this aggression is to extort Maliki because he refused to join the pre-election national destruction, which is backed Iran.
Also led by Mr. Hakim these days a ferocious media against Maliki, in his statement is not without demagoguery absurd, and to flatter the Iraqi street, which stated: "The poor service, despite the huge budget of the current government between 2006 and 2010, worth 300 billion dollars."
He asked: "Where are these funds spent? Is responsible for this spending? ... When we will witness the resignation of officials failed to perform their functions and duties?".
Here we would like to draw attention to the 300 billion dollars, "the huge budget."
In response, Dr. Hussain al-Shahristani, oil minister, told a news conference, saying: "The oil revenues amounted to 171 billion dollars between 2006 and 2009, and that this figure represents 95 percent of government revenue
There are two objections to comments by Mr. Hakim, the first: If the state revenue from oil 171 billion dollars, plus 9 billion (5%) from other sources, totals equal to 180 billion dollars, it is where it came from the government the amount the additional amount of 120 billion dollars completely wasted by the Government Maliki?
The second objection is: Is the Maliki government is a one-party government to bear Maliki's party alone the consequences of corruption and deficiencies in services?
Or is the government of national partnership (or sectarian and ethnic - as some call) and involving different parties and political entities and components of the Iraqi people?
Note that the lion's share of Hakim's party, including those of the Ministry of Finance and member of the Presidential Council, which has veto power!!!?
We do not deny the existence of corruption and incompetence in the performance in the organs of the round, suffering from a lack of services, but why deny the role of Mr. Hakim and his party's ministers in the responsibility for negligence and waste?
It is all of the foregoing, we conclude that the statements by Mr. Hakim, and said the spokesman of his coalition that Iran is determined to stay al-Maliki as prime minister on the following evidence:
First, vigorous Mr. Ammar al-Hakim on the authority,
Secondly, the extreme hostility of the owners for personal reasons,
Third, recognizing that the reputation of Iran and reached the nadir, so if they want to discredit a political rival to them what they only linked to Iran.
Fourth, the implicit recognition of Iran's meddling in the Iraqi issue.
It is worth mentioning that the organization of al-Hakim (Supreme Islamic Council) and the organization of Muqtada al-Sadr, are making Iranian and Iranian-funded "of money I'm", and not Iranian support for them for what they have had an influence.
Finally, if Iran with Maliki really, what could the leadership of the Iraqi National Coalition's decision to reject the master, Ali Khamenei, and he went into the formation of the government in this predicament.
Needless to say, the political situation in Iraq is very complex, with mixed the cards for many reasons, including the legacy of the past, and the nature of Iraqi society and privacy, and conflicts raging between the forces of political power, and the multiplicity of political entities and the components of national, religious and sectarian, and interference by neighboring countries along with their media biased to one party or another, all these factors operate on mixing-piggledy, and the disruption of vision and mislead public opinion in Iraq.
The problem faced by the intellectual that he sometimes finds himself in a position to be attacking him to power, incredible and confirms all the rumors about and attitudes found, even if not absurd, but refused to cope with such situation, accusation of "intellectual power" ready right.
Below are some examples of the charges against al-Maliki difficult ratification, the folly it is the abuse of the mind, but Kzbnaha we are exposed to the charge of bias for a man, and God forbid!!!
It should be noted that some of the major political entities have external support from neighboring countries, Vaketlp "Iraqi" led by Dr. Iyad Allawi, backed by Syria, Saudi Arabia and other Gulf countries.
And "Iraqi National Coalition," led by Mr. Hakim, which includes the Supreme Islamic Council, the Sadrists and others, backed by Iran.
The coalition of the "state of law" led by Mr. Nouri al-Maliki, as I seem, without external support, not from Iran or others, as is well known and explicit hostility to Syria and Saudi Arabia who al-Maliki.
Also know that the Dawa Party, which belongs to Mr. Maliki, has cut off ties with Iran when he left in the eighties of the last century, and resorted to lead him to London and Damascus to get rid of the Iranian influence.
This is why we know that Maliki is not a follower of Iran, as some claim.
In the midst of this chaotic situation and Almillb, newspaper (Middle East) Saudi Arabia, renowned for their support of Dr. Allawi, reported the statement attributed to the source of the coalition of the wise, as saying that: "Iran is determined to keep al-Maliki despite the objections of everyone." (Middle East, 22/07/2010).
The purpose here is to discredit the Maliki and not love him and show it like a man Iran favorite!!.
**The usual in such cases, claimed the newspaper's correspondent that the source is "unnamed" This claim became cheap and easy way Itekz a book to pass the reports as they like.
Therefore, in this case, the reader uses that word to the wise Nebahth and its ability to analysis to distinguish the wheat from the chaff.
The true this statement as a source in the coalition of the wise, this is the door (the charge works and that was false) or, as our brothers the Egyptians: (hit me and cried, before me and complained about), since as explained above, the purpose of the broadcast so rumors is to keep the idea of bias Iran to block al-Hakim and discrediting al-Maliki. This, if anything, it indicates that the supporters of al-Hakim.
Began to realize that Iran's reputation in Iraq has fallen to the bottom because of the brutal interference in Iraqi affairs, and not the latest occupation of the oil wells Fakkah border.
If Iran is really biased towards Maliki's why it took this terrible act of aggression against Iraq, which was the primary purpose is to embarrass the Maliki and is shown to be weak against its rivals.
In fact, the purpose of this aggression is to extort Maliki because he refused to join the pre-election national destruction, which is backed Iran.
Also led by Mr. Hakim these days a ferocious media against Maliki, in his statement is not without demagoguery absurd, and to flatter the Iraqi street, which stated: "The poor service, despite the huge budget of the current government between 2006 and 2010, worth 300 billion dollars."
He asked: "Where are these funds spent? Is responsible for this spending? ... When we will witness the resignation of officials failed to perform their functions and duties?".
Here we would like to draw attention to the 300 billion dollars, "the huge budget."
In response, Dr. Hussain al-Shahristani, oil minister, told a news conference, saying: "The oil revenues amounted to 171 billion dollars between 2006 and 2009, and that this figure represents 95 percent of government revenue
There are two objections to comments by Mr. Hakim, the first: If the state revenue from oil 171 billion dollars, plus 9 billion (5%) from other sources, totals equal to 180 billion dollars, it is where it came from the government the amount the additional amount of 120 billion dollars completely wasted by the Government Maliki?
The second objection is: Is the Maliki government is a one-party government to bear Maliki's party alone the consequences of corruption and deficiencies in services?
Or is the government of national partnership (or sectarian and ethnic - as some call) and involving different parties and political entities and components of the Iraqi people?
Note that the lion's share of Hakim's party, including those of the Ministry of Finance and member of the Presidential Council, which has veto power!!!?
We do not deny the existence of corruption and incompetence in the performance in the organs of the round, suffering from a lack of services, but why deny the role of Mr. Hakim and his party's ministers in the responsibility for negligence and waste?
It is all of the foregoing, we conclude that the statements by Mr. Hakim, and said the spokesman of his coalition that Iran is determined to stay al-Maliki as prime minister on the following evidence:
First, vigorous Mr. Ammar al-Hakim on the authority,
Secondly, the extreme hostility of the owners for personal reasons,
Third, recognizing that the reputation of Iran and reached the nadir, so if they want to discredit a political rival to them what they only linked to Iran.
Fourth, the implicit recognition of Iran's meddling in the Iraqi issue.
It is worth mentioning that the organization of al-Hakim (Supreme Islamic Council) and the organization of Muqtada al-Sadr, are making Iranian and Iranian-funded "of money I'm", and not Iranian support for them for what they have had an influence.
Finally, if Iran with Maliki really, what could the leadership of the Iraqi National Coalition's decision to reject the master, Ali Khamenei, and he went into the formation of the government in this predicament.
